• Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well the shortest path is a drilling submarine to go through two continents and the bottom of an ocean. Unfortunately it will take aproximately 87 years to get there this way.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This reminds me of a Mad Magazine comic from the 1960s (or 70s I don’t remember) that had a secret agent or someone like that use a computer to ‘calculate the fastest route to his destination’ and it drives him through every building in the city since that would be a straight line…

    Some shit doesn’t change.

    • crank0271@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      So like the Hyperloop where every passenger sits in their own Tesla and rides along at low speeds? Like the log flume but incredibly stupid.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is so wrong. The fastest route is going west from LA to Paris, because that will make you go back in time. By the time you land in Paris, it’s the previous day!!

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Surely we should have AI pilots by now.

    It would make all flights much faster…

    spoiler

    … because the plane would crash well before reaching the destination.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Can’t wait for some tech bro to create self-flying planes that are actually just a terrible version of the current autopilot that claims autonomy but crashes half the planes.

      Then they will blame air traffic controllers for the crashes for not adapting to the self flying planes or some other bullshit.

      • masuhiro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’d be impressed if they created anything close to flying. My money is on them making “ground planes” and it’s just a shittier train for the millionth time

    • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Actually automated starts, landing and flight are all pretty old tech. The reason planes are still piloted/supervised by humans is the same reason why the “autonomous taxis” are still remotely supervised and controlled by humans – there will be a situation the autopilot cannot handle.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, that’s another layer of the joke: tech bros trying to shove AI were there is already a working solution in place which is more reliable.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    anyone have contacts at Delta?

    My dear brother in Christ, there’s a reason that you don’t

  • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wow!

    With AI you can be just as wrong as you are without it, but also destroy the earth and be told you’re a good boy by a souless mechanism… Yay

  • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel like this is one of the things AI would actually understand. Since it a problem which is solved very frequently. AI would get tripped up by creative thinking.