

I don’t even know how to use a headphone jack to connect my Bluetooth headphones…


I don’t even know how to use a headphone jack to connect my Bluetooth headphones…


Everyone has experienced an AWS / Google Cloud / Azure outage or has had a service - you are happy to use switching to (more expensive) subscription service. That’s two things that are not going to happen to self-hosters (except the outage thing, but you can actually do something about it when it happens).


And Minecraft Server is developed by whom? Ah right Mojang. And they are doing as you suggested…


That’s a bold statement considering we are talking about a Minecraft server…


That’s what Mojang is doing. They decided to not play on it anymore…


Apart from multiplayer games:
You could use automated testing tools to do the work for you. You define your requirements as individual tests and every input is tested separately giving you a report which tests failed and which succeeded.


Setting aside the funny (if you’re not affected) coincidence of AWS being down I have to say this is an exemplary way on how upgrades should be announced, executed and documented. There is a migration guide, but even if you don’t read it - in most cases the software will take care of it itself. Well done!
Is your server running on UTC? Depending on your location midnight UTC could also be 8 AM and it could be a user with a very regular morning schedule.
Only you can find out which machine is sending this request…


I don’t see why this would be funny or weird. It isn’t like Apple where there would be no other devices to use them…


And you used this technique in every one of them?


Immich obviously does not follow semantic versioning when 2.0 is to be considered the first stable version.


I’ve had a bunch of different smart plugs, but as of today I only use the Shelly ones. They never failed me, have hardly any delay, are very configurable (if needed) and I even converted some of my wall plugs to Shelly devices.


I totally agree with you that having Google as the only one able to assign these certificates is a problem. This needs to change (and I rely heavily on the EU to enforce this), but I still think that everyone who is publishing an app to an undisclosed number of people (and therefore there is no implicit trust by design) should identify him- or herself to some authority.


My argument isn’t “it could be worse” - my argument is “that’s how it should have been from the beginning”.


At the moment (I am willing to change my opinion if that changes) Google has announced that for your personal use you won’t need to submit any ID. This just shows me you haven’t even read the whole thing, but just the headline and your opinion on this was set.


That freedom is still there. The only thing going away is installing from an undisclosed source.


If you want to distribute an app to a larger audience you should be willing to do so. Sure you could say it’s everyone’s personal risk installing an unsigned app on their phone, but making these people compile the app themselves isn’t too much to ask for. Tools to automate this to the max will appear.


I know I will get downvoted for this opinion, but I like this.
Developers who decided not to use Play Store can still do so, but are required to identify themselves. I get that not everyone is willing to do this, but there still is a free way to compile apps yourself and put it on your phone.
I am a developer myself and I have published apps for iOS and Android in the past and this process still is way easier than anything an iOS developer has to do to just install an app on his personal phone.
Isn’t that just for the latest feature where the last active app can draw on the always on display?