There were several legal challenges, especially against the concentration camps. They were quite close to succeeding
Trump’s legal troubles are very similar, especially is regards to their shared attempts to overthrow the government (although Hitler lost and received a stern slap on the wrist)
I didn’t read the whole thing, just got far enough to understand one of their fundamental assumptions is that a universe outside a simulation follows the same fundamental laws of nature as ours
If we are in a simulation, anything outside of it is effectively unknowable. It would be like a self-aware sim in The Sims determining they are not in a simulation because it is impossible for computers to simulate anything – computers only raise the entertainment stat (I don’t actually know what they do in modern incarnations of the game)
I had a similar issue with a Windows laptop recently
Trump literally owns the country club for elites
What’s with these top union people being so blatantly stupid, näive and gullible?
I don’t see that at all. He knows exactly what he’s doing: Selling out the union for his own gain. It’s not incompetence – it’s greed
I think the part that bothers me the most is the fact Cuomo apparently paid for that slop?
I like how different people have said each different item is the main cause of heart disease
Reminds me of the joke that github should just hire malware developers to fix the install process of every random git repo that requires pages of install instructions and an entire book of troubleshooting
A lot of them are actively talking about how it could be a bubble and the implications. No one is going to be surprised. Billionaires are just really hoping they can make it work before the bubble pops
what really is lacking is now more hardware dedicated to single user sessions to improve quality of output with the current models
That is the exact opposite of my opinion. They’re throwing tons of computing at the current models. It has produced little improvement. The vast majority of investment is in compute hardware, rather than R&D. They need more R&D to improve the underlying models. More hardware isn’t going to get the significant gains we need
I wouldn’t have a problem if they were actually investing the money in something useful like R&D
Nearly all the investment is in data centers. Their approach for the past 2 years seems to be just throwing more hardware at existing approaches, which is a really great way to burn an absurd amount of money for little to nothing in return
AI is here to stay. AI is also in an unsustainable bubble. Both things are true
investment bankers are the worst
Lawyers are even worse T.T
Trump won the majority of white women voters in 2024
Technically true, but you’re twisting the stats really hard to support your incorrect narrative. Women as a demographic group voted Harris. Since that contradicted the narrative you wanted to portray, you picked a sub-group of white women. White women, as a whole, did indeed favor Trump in the election, but younger white women did not. The 18-49 white demographic as a whole favored Harris by a razor thin margin. If we also wanted to add in the fact she is single, that would push the demographic even more towards Harris
Young people do not favor Trump, especially not young, single, white women. You were incorrect to cherry pick data implying the opposite
Sources: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/voting-patterns-in-the-2024-election/
After we figured out I can use safe mode to bypass the password, he just started locking the computer desk. Learned to pick the lock within a couple days
It got to the point where he straight up would cut the power cord off things. Took less than an hour to learn to strip the wires and splice in a new end. He gave up after that
In hindsight, there may have been signs I would go into security engineering
Each line is 10,000 characters and the function only supports short primitives
Yes, and it only returns, “I can’t even”
we don’t use this without first writing proper unit tests for our changes, integrating them with the regression tests, and thoroughly documenting our changes for the next developer that has to work on this
I’m an optimist, and it’s technically possible
Separate minimum wages doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. Especially when it’s so hyper specific:
minimum wage that would apply to construction workers on any housing project with 10 or more units and a height of up to 85 feet
So we’re incentivizing smaller buildings, which is the exact opposite of what we need. Large, single-family homes being the only housing allowed in large swaths of cities is what got us the housing crisis. Now we’re incentivizing them even more?
Construction workers currently earn a median wage of $18 per hour in L.A. and frequently face wage theft
The fact they’re nearly doubling the prevailing wage for construction on apartment buildings, without addressing wage theft makes it abundantly clear this bill is about disincentivizing dense housing
It’s just a bill to further inflate housing prices dressed up as helping workers. The main group that will benefit from this is wealthy landlords
Am I missing a joke here?