deleted by creator

Which also exposes the comb-over job too…

Any Cyber professionals think I should just go all in and minor in IT or CS? Or does spreading out a bit more sound good?

Learn programming in your own time, as there’s ample resources to learn languages common to cybersecurity (C, C++, Python, <insert instruction set here> Assembler (if reverse engineering is your thing)) outside of college/university.

Pick something that makes you different and marketable against other cybersecurity majors. Given the way the world is going, look at political science, organised crime, or even counter-terrorism, as all of these have streams, if not rivers, into and out of cybersecurity these days.

It provides a much broader context around your cybersecurity studies, other than just being a technical resource, by understanding why threat actors use technical means to attack, rather than just ‘how’ or ‘with what’. Minoring in something other than a technical discipline would broaden your career options to policy roles, among others.

All that said, the minor subject(s) you choose must interest you. Japanese would be really useful to have in a cybersecurity role as it opens doors to communicate with other cybersecurity experts in their own language, including government authorities. Such skills may be desirable by the intelligence community, though I’d be wildly speculating here.

Use your minor to help you expose niches in the discipline that can help you pivot your career, and set you apart from an ocean of dime-a-dozen cybersecurity experts who just did broad, common, technical studies.

A word of advice: Play the long game. My advice may not immediately come to fruition when you land your first paid gig, but it will definitely become a useful playing card as your career develops, providing you maintain those skills. Hell, they don’t even need to be part of your minor subjects. Learning Japanese outside of college/university will still make you marketable.

That’s what I would’ve thought…

Though would the vehemently anti-paedophile Deep State suddenly forget about Trump when the Epstein Files are released?

I’m genuinely not so sure their blind faith in Orange Jesus will remain resolute when even MTG is demanding their release.

Here’s a thought…

Let’s say someone - like JD Vance - wins the presidency on an ‘I’ll resign on Day 1 and nominate Speaker Trump to take my place’ ticket (assuming the succession rules are changed too).

Why would he? Why would someone willingly give up the unchecked power of the most powerful person on the planet?

We’ve seen just how completely broken the U.S. is now, effectively having a king thanks to the Supreme Court. The first ‘official’ act of this new President, before they chose to resign, would be to release the Epstein files, arrest Trump, and put him on trial for all of his crimes.

That way they keep all of this unchecked power to themselves.

and an opportunity to build a bunker under a ballroom.

There already was…

The two-story East Wing was added to the White House in 1942 primarily to cover the construction of an underground bunker, now known as the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Wing

They already do.

I was thinking exactly the same thing.

Words like those used all the time completely destroy their impact. ‘Meltdown’ now is just a dummy spit.

Show them this video: https://youtu.be/Ame0j8jbMY4

Then tell them voting is exactly the same as discussing politics.

https://revolt.chat/

It’s open source too.

What I’m saying is, you might feel like you’re not misgendering, but if someone is binary and you use a non-binary pronoun, you are misgendering.

I don’t disagree with your first statement.

However I do disagree with your second statement, quoted above, because it’s so broad that even people trying to do the right thing, or least harmful thing, can be accused of misgendering or be policed by others for simply trying to be inclusive.

Whilst a technicality, it really rubs non-gender diverse people the wrong way, and makes it harder for gender diverse people, myself included, to drive broader acceptance of us in the community when all we’re known for is telling others they’re ‘wrong’ when they accidentally mess up a pronoun or three.

There’s a very fine balance to be struck between being inclusive, and being correct.

If someone gets a person’s gender wrong accidentally because they were unsure, that shouldn’t, and doesn’t in my view, count as misgendering simply because it was a misunderstanding.

However if someone deliberately, or maliciously refers to someone as their assigned gender at birth, that’s misgendering which should absolutely be called out and derided.

But … is that automatically anyone else’s preference?

No, and that’s the really hard part. Most would agree that ‘they/them/they’re’ (and so on) is generally safer than a gendered pronoun if unsure. It’s also really hard when someone’s pronouns, again for those in the back: are just as valid as mine, aren’t ones in common use.

There’s a non-exhaustive list here: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/08/incomplete-list-gender-pronouns/

It’s much easier with friends, as you’ll generally get into a groove eventually. However, is less so with strangers.

Even asking someone’s pronouns could be met with confused looks from time to time. Context matters. If I asked for the pronouns of a farmer with a thousand yard stare and sun-kissed leather skin to match in my part of the world, despite growing up in the country, I’d probably be punched in the face. 😂

Strong disagree. Using ‘they/them’ when you’re generally unsure about a person’s gender isn’t misgendering.

I’m a binary trans woman. If someone is generally unsure about my gender, because it can be ambiguous from time to time, they/them when referring to me is perfectly acceptable. I would suggest most other people are fine with they/them in this instance as well.

Pronouns can be quite a minefield to navigate, especially for those not used to using they/them when all they’ve ever known is binary terms growing up.

Speaking as an ‘elder’ trans person, some pronouns in use, which are just as valid as mine!, are genuinely difficult to remember because there are so many of them. I’m talking about the ones that aren’t part of the English language in common use. I default to ‘they/them’ in those instances because using the person’s assigned gender at birth would be genuinely hurtful; I don’t want to hurt someone.

I feel very much that our own, gender diverse, community is driving those outside of it away by being so strict with/overt policing of pronouns, that those who aren’t gender diverse find the whole ‘pronoun’ thing too complicated, then either refuse to engage with us or deliberately misgender because its easier. This is especially true for older conservative cis people.

We didn’t boot him out. He willingly, perhaps gleefully, did it himself.

He’s not Australian. Cunt gave up his Australian citizenship to buy a U.S. TV station. And yet still believes he can manipulate us too.

As far as we’re concerned, he’s dead to us.

I’m not sure he’s much more competent, especially when it comes to successfully undoing the damage just enough to keep the GOP in power, by the skin of their teeth, whilst still grifting everything that isn’t welded down.

That, and he doesn’t and likely will never have the cult of personality.

I’d wager that once he who shall not be named is removed from office, the rest of the party will implode into a self-interested factional civil war.

What are the chances of him being booted out via 25th Amendment in the next six months?

It might buy JD just enough time to prevent the Republicans being utterly wiped out in the mid-terms…

Unrelated, though what’s with Musk, perhaps other MAGAts, wearing the MAGA hat like that in the thumbnail: barely touching their head, so much that a slight breeze would knock it off.

Is it some sort of literal ‘big brain’ show off thing?

It’s quite poetic that they’re painting ‘wokeness’, signified by the ‘W’ of the paint strokes, over language the machine itself is calling ‘woke’…

Some perspective.

We are talking about errors of perception measured by orders of magnitude.