

I feel like your piece abour unionization is a bit pessimistic. “Non-essential” industries have unions and go on strike already (e.g. actors, writers, coffee shops, liquor sales come to mind from my view, maybe I’m biased bc I’m in the imperial core but this shows organizing sex work in the imperial core at least could borrow from these industries). Also, it’s good to still have worker collectives even if they cannot directly make demands in cases of attempting general strikes, or if “essential” unions wanted to do solidarity strikes with sex workers to help their cause, no? Also also, I do think there currently exist various sex worker unions already, although they’re small scale.
To be clear, sex work is like one of the worst things to be, but this doesn’t mean that we should admonish the people most acutely affected by this precarity (sex workers) for their circumstance. If we acknowledge that sex workers are exploited on such an extreme level, we should support these workers in their demands.



Like a 3 or 4 LMAO. I’m pretty set in my ways, I’m willing to hear most people out but only in an effort to change someone else’s mind, not really to change my own. That said, if you are on the left (i.e. identify as anti-capitalist, at minimum), then I will legitimately take your perspective and stances into consideration.
This doesn’t mean that I’m not empathetic or that I shut people down, I’m very conflict averse as well. I just take in what people say, push back maybe a little, and try to understand their perspective while mine still remains unchanged.